Whistler XTR690
Whistler PRO78
GF100 laser jammer
Stinger DSI Computer
Drive Video Recorder
Valentine1 radar
Escort 9500i + GPS
Escort 9500ci Stealth
Tiredness Warning
Laser Jammer Tester
Car MP3 player + USB
Alcohol tester + LCD
Mini alcohol tester
| Are the Beltronics STI-Driver and Beltronics STI-XR AUS-NZ the same detector?Beltronics STI and Beltronics STI-XR (exclusively Australian market) appear identical in every way, including performance, visual, hardware, software and factory default settings.
Both Beltronics STI and Beltronics STI-XR that we have evaluated here were current A4M9 versions. Beltronics STI vs. STI-XR packaging comparisonMain packaging components appear identical in every way. Minor differences are noted in the user guide and retail box primarily to do with warranty registration. All differences seem to be on printed paper only, no actual hardware differences at all.
Beltronics STI vs. STI-XR metal case comparisonPictured left is the US Beltronics STI and pictured right is the "Australian" Beltronics STI-XR. You will notice that the XR NZ-AUS sticker is paper and not even attached straight. It is easily removed to reveal an identical design as the US model on the left, see below. Beneath this paper sticker is the American STI logo.
Beltronics STI vs. STI-XR metal case comparison, NZ-AUS sticker removedHere are the same two detectors with the paper XR NZ-AUS sticker removed. It is reasonable to expect a custom product would also have a custom screen print design. Screen printing is relatively inexpensive and easy to produce even for short manufacturing runs. So far it appears the only differences are two paper stickers.
Beltronics STI vs. STI-XR internal component examinationBoth units are based on Atmel 8 bit processors with separate flash memory. A careful examination of ALL mounted components show NO apparent differences in the design. We have previously inspected inside the antenna and also found no noticeable differences.
Beltronics STI vs. STI-XR serial number sticker comparisonEven a cursory examination of the serial number and compliance sticker on the bottom of each detector shows no differences other than the serial number. Each sticker has the SAME FCC approval number for sale and distribution in the USA. If a design had been modified it would be reasonable to expect a different FCC approval number. However as the Beltronics STI-XR is exclusively sold via Australia, there is actually no point even having or mentioning FCC approval. It appears that the required Australian C-TICK N671 label is attached "after manufacturing" for Australian electronic device compliance. It seems this label has been attached by hand as it is not even straight. It is also reasonable to expect that had the Beltronics STI-XR been "manufactured specifically for Australia" that the MANDATORY C-TICK logo would have been included on the FACTORY compliance sticker? Even $19 kitchen appliances sold in Australia have the C-TICK logo on their main compliancy labels. Take a look at the toaster or kettle in your kitchen right now!
Beltronics STI vs. STI-XR default programming and operating modeRecommended operating modes and programming are different for USA and Australian conditions. Each of the Beltronics STI and Beltronics STI-XR radar detectors tested here is capable of being configured for either use in the USA or Australia via the user menus. These settings are as follows;
Beltronics STI: Auto Scan, All bands on (X, K, Ka, Laser, POP etc,) SWS off. Beltronics STI-XR: Highway, X band Off, K, Ka and Laser On, Pop Off, SWS on.
If each detector is RESET to FACTORY defaults, strangely the STI-XR reverts to the exact same PROGRAMMING and OPERATING MODE (Auto Scan) as the original Beltronics STI. Both radar detectors report the EXACT SAME software revision number of A4M9. Other than a paper sticker, how could even the manufacturer tell these units apart if there is no permanently affixed label and the reported software version numbers are identical?
NOTE: There appears to be a common misconception propagated on internet forums that the Beltronics STI-XR somehow has X-band permanently disabled via default software settings. This is explicitly not the case and are false statements. Software versions and default programming and operating mode are all identical. Click the link below to see our reset video. It is reasonable to expect if a product has been specifically "enhanced and manufactured for Australian conditions" as claimed by the Australian distributor, that the default programming would actually be for Australian conditions and not for the USA. When each unit is RESET they also report the brand and model as "Bel STI" there is plenty of room to include "Bel STI-XR" in a customized product for Australia.
Beltronics STI vs. STI-XR performance and detection comparisonWe extensively test drove a Beltronics STI and a Beltronics STI-XR in both side by side and individually and could see no difference in the operation, warnings and quantity of false alerts. We tested against the same camera twice and each detector performed fairly much identically, in the second test the beeping is just about synchronised showing identical detection capabilities. Other radar detector brands such as Whistler radar and Valentine One with specific Euro / Multanova detection have been reported to perform up to 20~30% better. We observed no difference in a Beltronics STI-XR that is claimed to be specifically manufactured for Australia.
Beltronics STI vs. STI-XR comparison conclusionsFrom the evidence gathered above, we can make the following conclusions and assumptions. If any person can provide justifiable evidence to the contrary, we are more than happy to update this evaluation. We will soon provide a similar comparison between Beltronics 995 and Beltronics XR-70.
From the above evidence we can safely make the following assumptions. Beltronics STI (world wide) and Beltronics STI-XR (exclusively Australian market) appear identical in every way, including performance, visual, hardware, software and factory default settings. Performance has also been independently rated at being identical. It appears that Beltronics STI-XR are opened in Australia, have labels attached and programmed for Australian conditions. It is highly unlikely that any of these customisations are made at the "factory" level, nor do they constitute any real difference (other than user selectable settings or printed text) to the US Beltronics STI radar detector. From our inquiries, there is no evidence to suggest Beltronics STI-XR is "designed and enhanced for Australian conditions" appears to be false and deliberately deceiving.
It would be interesting to observe if the Australian Beltronics distributor is able to identify their own "unique" product from a line up of original Beltronics STI detectors. We are currently sourcing an Atmel processor test board to extract and compare software checksums on these two units.
|
Beltronics STI-XR radar detectors sold in Australia appear identical to worldwide Beltronics STI radar detectors.